Mohammed Ajmal Kasab

There have been a lot of discussions and debate regarding whether Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, the lone terrorist caught alive in the midst of the Mumbai terror attacks on the November 26th, 2008 should be provided with an advocate to defend him or not.

I absolutely dont understand what is there to be defended? Should we defend him for the cold blooded murder of so many innocent people or for the killing of ATS chief Hemant Karkare  or because he has shown a lot of courage, not worrying about his life and dedicating himself completely to the Jihadist manifesto...and the list of the crimes is endlesss...

On one point I seem to agree with Bal Thackery that he should be hanged in the Mumbai streets mercilessly...or better Mr. Bal Thackery I would suggest just leave him for the people because he is the culprit of the citizens of India not just Mumbai. That would be a fitting tribute to all those people who were murdered in cold blood and also a lesson to the terrorists.

I was taken completely aback after reading some of the blogs: 

-> Yes. He should be defended. It is the hallmark of civilization and a practice in existence in India from time immemorial. No one is guilty until proved so is the basic principle which governs jurisprudence. As we are a civilised society, we must extend this.

Wow dude excellent ! You are the fitting candidate to defend this savage. 

In this land of the mahatma all types of criminals have human rights.This is called gandhigiri. If you leave Ajmal you will be hailed Gandhi's true follower.There 's a nobel peace prize waiting too.

-> If we dont give him a legal trial the terrorist organisations would become very angry and would next time strike India more brutally...we should look to pacify them and talk to them to achieve a friendly solution...

Disgusting cowards! Thats all I have to say.  

Shameless Kasab eats roti and chana masala and demands for non-veg daily. He wishes to meet Bipasha Basu too. Just see the courage. lol...

As far as defending him is concerned what his advocate gonna argue? What evidence he gonna show ?

He has been caught on live cameras and he has also accepted his crime.
That would  just be a wastage of time.

Do you remember what happened in the case of Mohammed Azar when his trial extended for 3 years? 

Do we want the same to happen again?

 What I think is Indian Constitution and the laws should be made dynamic rather than  rigid and inflexible. They should be commensurate to the fast changing or rather mushrooming crimes. 

If a person who poses such grave threat to the national security has to be defended in our country just because the laws require it to be so...then its a big shame for our country.